When Lifestyle Becomes a Liability: The Hidden Cost of the New American Dream
Share this article
The American dream has always been a moving target. For decades it was defined by a specific image: a home in a quiet neighborhood, a reliable car in the driveway, the steady accumulation of things that signal stability and arrival. That image has been replaced by something considerably more expensive and considerably less understood.
The new aspiration is urban, curated, and visible. It is the residence in a desirable address rather than the home in a quiet suburb. It is the vehicle that communicates something about the person behind the wheel rather than the one that simply moves them from one place to another. It is the fashion choices, the brands, eating at the right restaurants, the membership to the right clubs. The goalpost has moved decisively away from the accumulation of value and toward the performance of success.
What most people do not examine carefully enough is what this shift has done to their balance sheet.
The Category That Has No Clear Name
In traditional financial planning, the distinction between an asset and a liability is foundational. An asset generates value, appreciates, or produces income. A liability consumes resources, generates ongoing costs, and diminishes over time. The line between them, while occasionally blurry at the margins, has historically been reasonably clear.
That line is no longer clear.
A category has emerged over the past two decades that sits uncomfortably between the two. It is not a liability in the conventional sense, because it can be owned, it may appreciate, and it carries real financial weight on a personal balance sheet. But it behaves like a liability in the ways that matter most: it demands ongoing resources, it generates costs the owner cannot fully control, and its value is increasingly determined not by what it produces but by what it costs to maintain.
This category I call it the lifestyle assets. And for a growing number of individuals, including many who have built significant wealth, it has become one of the most consequential and least examined dimensions of their financial lives.
The Condo as Case Study
No single asset illustrates this category more clearly than the urban condominium.
On its surface, the condo is unambiguously an asset. It can be purchased outright, it occupies a real position on a balance sheet, and in many markets it has appreciated meaningfully over time. For a generation that has reoriented its aspirations around location, walkability, and the cultural capital of a particular address, it has also become the defining symbol of a certain kind of success.
What this generation is discovering, often after the purchase has been made, is that condo ownership comes with a cost structure that behaves nothing like ownership and everything like subscription.
Monthly fees assessed by the governing association cover shared building expenses, amenities, and reserve funds for future maintenance. These fees do not disappear when the mortgage is paid. They do not diminish as the owner’s financial relationship with the asset matures. In many cases they increase, sometimes substantially, and the owner has limited recourse. The asset has been purchased. The subscription, however, is mandatory and cannot be cancelled.
This dynamic has been magnified in the South Florida market in ways that other markets have not yet confronted. Following the structural collapse of a coastal residential tower, the state enacted legislation requiring comprehensive structural inspections and mandatory reserve funding for buildings meeting specific criteria. The result has been a wave of special assessments and accelerating fee increases across the condominium market that have fundamentally altered the financial proposition of ownership. Buildings that were purchased as appreciating assets have become, for many owners, sources of recurring financial stress whose ongoing cost rivals or exceeds the carrying cost of equivalent rental accommodations in the same market.
The value of the asset is now partially a function of how expensive it is to own. That is a characteristic that belongs to a liability.
The Honest Accounting of Lifestyle Purchases
There is a meaningful distinction between the condo and a yacht, though both belong to the same broader category of lifestyle acquisition.
The person who purchases a yacht enters the transaction with a degree of financial clarity that the condo owner frequently does not. The yacht is understood, at some level, to be a lifestyle purchase. The ongoing costs, while substantial, are anticipated as part of the experience. The depreciation is accepted as the price of what the asset provides: a particular kind of freedom, a particular quality of experience, access to a life that cannot be replicated in other ways. These are legitimate values, and the individuals who pursue them are not confused about the nature of what they are acquiring.
The condo owner, by contrast, frequently enters the transaction with the genuine belief that they are making a sound financial decision, an investment in real property that will appreciate, that can be owned free and clear, and that represents a form of financial progress. The ongoing costs are either not fully understood at the point of purchase or are understood in isolation without being modeled against the trajectory they tend to follow over time.
This is the distinction that matters. It is not whether a lifestyle asset is purchased. It is whether the person purchasing it understands what they are actually acquiring and has structured the rest of their financial life to absorb it.
The Subscription That Cannot Be Cancelled
The subscription economy has transformed how Americans spend money on virtually everything. Software, entertainment, fitness, transportation, and food have all been restructured around recurring payments that continue until the subscriber chooses to stop.
Lifestyle assets have adopted the economic logic of the subscription model while removing the single most important feature that makes subscriptions tolerable: the ability to cancel.
The owner of a condominium in a building with escalating fees and mandatory assessments is not a subscriber who has grown dissatisfied with the product. They are a stakeholder in a collective financial arrangement over which they have limited individual control, and their exit from that arrangement requires the sale of the underlying asset, which is itself complicated by the same conditions that motivated the exit. A building with significant pending assessments or chronically rising fees is not an attractive purchase for the next buyer. The market knows this. Prices adjust accordingly.
This dynamic has been observed clearly in markets where fee escalation has outpaced the capacity of the market to absorb it. Sellers discover that the asset they believed had appreciated has, in net terms, produced a return that the fee structure has quietly eroded. The subscription was mandatory. The cancellation was expensive.
The Pressure This Creates Across the Wealth Spectrum
It would be a mistake to frame this as a concern exclusive to the middle class. The financial pressure created by lifestyle assets that carry uncontrollable ongoing costs is a condition that does not respect net worth.
High earners who have allocated significant capital to real estate in markets where fee structures are escalating, or who have built lives organized around a collection of lifestyle assets each carrying its own recurring cost burden, find that their financial picture is considerably more complicated than their income or their balance sheet headline would suggest. Liquidity that appears to exist is committed to ongoing obligations. Flexibility that wealth is supposed to provide is constrained by the cost of maintaining the life that wealth has been used to construct.
The question that this creates for anyone who has accumulated meaningful assets is not whether lifestyle purchases are appropriate. For most people at a certain level of wealth, they are entirely appropriate and they represent a legitimate expression of what that wealth is for. The question is whether those purchases have been made with a clear understanding of their ongoing cost structure, whether that cost structure has been modeled against the trajectory it is likely to follow, and whether the financial architecture around the lifestyle is designed to absorb what the lifestyle actually costs rather than what it appeared to cost at the point of acquisition.
The line between an asset and a liability has always required careful examination. In an environment where that line has been deliberately obscured, the examination has become more important than ever.
At Guzhuna, the conversations we find most consequential are often not about the investments that appear on a statement. They are about the full picture of what a financial life actually costs to sustain, how the lifestyle a client has built or is building interacts with the financial architecture designed to support it, and whether the decisions being made today are creating optionality or quietly eliminating it. Wealth is not only what you own. It is what your obligations allow you to do with what you own.
Let's start a conversation today.
About the Author
Jori Guzhuna
Jori Guzhuna is the Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Guzhuna Financial Group, where he advises entrepreneurs, executives, and affluent families on sophisticated wealth, risk, and estate planning strategies. His practice focuses on integrating investment management, tax-efficient planning, financial architecture, executive compensation, and asset protection into cohesive long-term plan.
Known for his institutional approach and strategic perspective, Jori specializes in helping clients navigate complex financial environments involving business succession, multigenerational wealth transfer, cross-border planning, and liability management. His work often centers around protecting wealth while creating structures designed to support long-term continuity for families and closely held businesses.
As a fiduciary advisor, Jori brings a disciplined and risk-conscious philosophy to financial planning. He works closely with clients to simplify complex financial decisions and develop customized strategies aligned with their personal, business, and legacy objectives.
In addition to wealth planning, Jori has extensive experience in commercial risk management, employee benefits, executive compensation, and insurance planning. This broad perspective allows him to deliver comprehensive solutions that address both wealth creation and wealth preservation.
Jori earned his bachelor’s degree from New York University.
